Let’s talk psychology.
In my last post, I attempted to dismantle a common claim
against polyamory. But, as I was alerted by an astute reader, my response was
largely subjective. Why not throw in this
psychology article? he asked. I agree. Let’s get out of the armchair and
into the lab.
The authors of this article noticed that even though
monogamy is not the norm for human relationships around the globe, people just assume it’s the ideal. So we have plenty
of research on attachment styles in dyadic (couple) relationships, but none on
anything else. This leads to a void in the literature. The authors wanted to
fill that void by answering a simple question: how do polyamorous people score
on measures of attachment avoidance and attachment anxiety?
First, let’s talk about what these terms mean. Attachment
anxiety is when you’re obsessed with “the availability of [your] romantic
partner” and feel extreme jealousy when you think that “availability” might be
in jeopardy. Attachment avoidance is when you try not to get close to your
romantic partner in order to avoid pain.
One common hypothesis among monogamists is that polyamorists
are simply rationalizing an avoidant attachment style. But let’s see what study
has to say about that.
The study had two parts.
- Study 1, which involved 1,281 heterosexual, monogamous respondents, showed that those who approved of polyamory
- Were more likely to have an avoidant attachment style
- Were less likely to have an anxious attachment style
- Study 2 (which involved 1,308 participants: 73% female, 85% currently in a monogamous relationship, and 15% currently in a swinging or polyamorous relationship) showed that, aside from reporting being “happy, satisfied, and in love,” people in polyamorous relationships tended to have
- lower levels of avoidance
- higher levels of trust
- lower levels of jealousy
So, yes, people who approved of polyamory had
higher levels of avoidance. This says something about the polyamorous philosophy; it appeals to people who tend to avoid intimacy. However, people who were actually in polyamorous arrangements had lower levels
of avoidance. So, it seems like the monogamist hypothesis is onto something, but still mostly wrong. People in polyamorous relationships usually do have secure attachment
styles.
The authors conclude that their findings “provide important
new evidence that people can exhibit aspects of security (i.e., low levels of
avoidance) without sexual exclusivity.”
Therefore, to the monogamist who tells the polyamorist that
he or she is “just using polyamory as a way to justify her avoiding intimacy,”
we can confidently say that there is at least one study that showed that
polyamorous people were less likely to have an avoidant attachment style.
We can also say that polyamorous people tend to have, as I speculated in my last post, higher levels of trust.
In other words: “Nope. Science.”
10 comments:
I wonder if it be concluded that the same people with a secure attachment style within a polyamorous relationship, might otherwise express a dismissive-avoidant attachment style in a monogamous relationship? And if the same is also true for people with an anxious-preoccupied attachment style?...
correction: 'if it can be concluded..."
Can you provide a citation for the study?
This is because the sexuality in the polyamorous relationship temporarily alieviates the anxiety created (creating further repression), but it nevertheless still exists.
This is different to monogamy where the anxiety level should remain the same in a secure partnership.
I see someone beat me to it, but because I have a slightly different perspective:
This makes me wonder if more social/romantic security "heals" people with avoidant attachment or it is better able to do so.
I know this study. Here's the full citation:
Moors, A. C.; Conley, T. D.; Edelstein, R. S.; Chopik, W. J. (2014). "Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy". Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 32 (2): 222–240.
There is one critical flaw though to the way the results of this study are being reported, including how the authors themselves reported it. In the Study 1 sample, the subjects were kept in the dark about what was being studied and were recruited from the general population. In the Study 2 sample, poly people were recruited in a targeted manner and knew what was being studied. This creates a bias in Sample 2, because they may have given inaccurate responses to the study questions simply because the subjects in study 2 were trying to make poly look good.
To explain, I've observed both as a clinician and in my social life that people into poly tend to be very dogmatic, almost like a religion. They constantly behave as the world is out to get them and they are on a mission to prove everyone wrong, that they are healthy people and engaged in healthy behavior. This in turn leads to them giving inaccurate appraisals of themselves and their emotional state. I've seen countless patients and acquaintances who swear up and down how they are trusting and stable with no mental or emotional problems, when over a long conversation they eventually reveal horrific childhood trauma, mental illness and intensely avoidant personalities. The problem is it's like pulling teeth; they're so entrenched in the poly dogma that they readily lie or obfuscate to avoid making poly "look bad." Other studies in the Middle East done on polygamous households found very similar results: Women in these households were miserable and mentally damaged by it, but fully believe it was all good and right, and they were totally fine and healthy. And this used control samples who were monogamous in the same towns and with the same religious beliefs and socioeconomic status.
Ed, thank you for your thoughtful reply.
acg: I agree so much with what you say. I have the same impression.
Ed, I read your comment about 15 months ago and I dismissed it. I went on a mission to prove you wrong. It took me about 9 months to realize that you were right. Your comment is SO spot on. There's a lot of smoke and mirrors in polyamory.
"I've observed both as a clinician and in my social life that people into poly tend to be very dogmatic, almost like a religion." Erm - this is anecdotal and as a clinician I'd expect you to stress that there are differences between a properly conducted study. They don't chime with mine at all. Most of the poly people I know simply present it as a valid rather than an innately desirable choice - i.e. 'it works for me, it may or may not work for you.' Your criticisms of the study may be pertinent however I think you need to lay out the reasons the researchers chose to conduct study 2 and be more specific. Simply knowing what a study concerns doesn't necessarily invalidate it and being transparent, for all I know, might have been necessitated by the types of questions being asked.
Lastly comparisons with polygamy in the Muslim world seem problematic. Having reported from a predominantly Muslim country and having looked fairly extensively at some of the problems arising from polygamy, it's hard to separate those from wider social issues and the limited standing of women, especially married women, under shariah law (ie disparity in rights to divorce, inheritance etc etc).
Post a Comment